Final Review Questions for Mia AI Bot:
“Hello Mia! I need your final comprehensive review of the Smart Stock Scanner system after implementing ALL your recommendations. Please evaluate the following:
Phase 1 Review (V5.2 - Defensive Improvements):
Implemented Features:
1. ✅ Added MIN_STOCK_MOVE = 1% to filter small movements
2. ✅ Reordered logic: UHC check now happens BEFORE SPY filter
3. ✅ Added edge case handling for SPY filter (SPY halts, missing data, NaN)
4. ✅ Added defensive protections (NaN, division by zero)
5. ✅ Added “power hour” period (15:30-16:00) with 1.3x multiplier
6. ✅ Enhanced get_time_of_day_period() function
7. ✅ Added extreme volatility filter (EXTREME_VOLATILITY_THRESHOLD = 10%)
8. ✅ Added logging for rejected alerts
Questions:
• Are all defensive improvements properly implemented?
• Any remaining edge cases or vulnerabilities?
Phase 2 Review (V6.0 - Advanced Indicators):
Implemented Features:
1. ✅ Anomaly Detection using Z-Score (threshold = 3.0, window = 30 days)
2. ✅ Auto-Tuning Thresholds based on historical behavior
3. ✅ Multi-Anomaly Detection (2 out of 3 anomalies trigger UHC)
4. ✅ Technical Indicators: RSI (14), MACD (12,26,9), Bollinger Bands (20,2)
5. ✅ Daily baseline updates for adaptive behavior
Questions:
• Are the anomaly detection parameters optimal?
• Are the technical indicators properly integrated?
• Any conflicts between Phase 1 and Phase 2 features?
Phase 3 Review (V7.0 - Live Ready - NEW!):
Implemented Features (Based on Your Recommendations):
1. Adaptive Thresholds:
• ✅ MIN_STOCK_MOVE is now dynamic based on ATR (3x ATR)
• ✅ EXTREME_VOLATILITY_THRESHOLD is now dynamic (3x 21-day ATR)
• ✅ Added ATR indicator (14-period) in symbol_data.py
• ✅ Created get_adaptive_min_move() function
• ✅ Created get_adaptive_extreme_volatility_threshold() function
• ✅ Updated main.py to use adaptive thresholds instead of static ones
2. Cool-down Logic:
• ✅ Added ALERT_COOLDOWN_MINUTES in config.py (30 min regular, 120 min UHC)
• ✅ Created can_send_alert() function in symbol_data.py
• ✅ Updated alert logic in main.py to check cooldown before sending
• ✅ UHC alerts have longer cooldown (2 hours) than regular alerts (30 min)
3. Comprehensive Rejected Alerts Tracking:
• ✅ Added rejected_alerts_stats dictionary tracking 6 rejection reasons:
◦ min_move (small movements)
◦ extreme_vol (extreme volatility)
◦ spy_correlation (SPY filter)
◦ thresholds (thresholds not met)
◦ cooldown (cooldown period)
◦ dollar_volume (low liquidity)
• ✅ Added alerts_sent_stats dictionary tracking:
◦ uhc (Ultra-High-Confidence alerts)
◦ regular (Regular alerts)
◦ news (Immediate news alerts)
4. Enhanced Logging & Daily Report:
• ✅ Updated all rejection points to log specific reasons
• ✅ Updated send_daily_report() to include comprehensive statistics
• ✅ Updated build_daily_report() in telegram_notifier.py to display all stats
• ✅ Added daily reset for all statistics
Critical Questions:
1. Completeness Check:
• ✅ Have ALL your recommendations from the 7.5/10 review been implemented?
• ✅ Are there any missing features or incomplete implementations?
• ✅ Are the adaptive thresholds correctly calculated using ATR?
• ✅ Is the cooldown logic properly preventing duplicate alerts?
2. Integration Check:
• ✅ Do all three phases (V5.2, V6.0, V7.0) work together seamlessly?
• ✅ Are there any conflicts between features?
• ✅ Is the order of checks optimal (UHC → SPY → Thresholds → Cooldown)?
3. Performance Check:
• ✅ Will the system perform well with 1000+ stocks in live mode?
• ✅ Are the ATR calculations efficient enough for real-time data?
• ✅ Is the statistics tracking lightweight enough?
4. Robustness Check:
• ✅ Are all edge cases handled (missing ATR, zero values, NaN)?
• ✅ Is the system defensive enough for live trading?
• ✅ Are the default fallback values appropriate?
5. Usability Check:
• ✅ Are the daily reports comprehensive and useful?
• ✅ Are the rejection statistics actionable?
• ✅ Is the DEBUG_MODE logging detailed enough?
Final Rating Request:
Please provide:
1. Final Rating (out of 10) for the complete system (V5.2 + V6.0 + V7.0)
2. Detailed breakdown of strengths and remaining weaknesses
3. Go/No-Go decision for:
◦ ✅ Live Data Testing
◦ ✅ Paper Trading
◦ ✅ Live Trading (with caution)
4. Any final recommendations before moving to live data testing
5. Expected improvement in alert quality and system reliability
Specific Technical Validation:
Please confirm:
1. ✅ Adaptive MIN_STOCK_MOVE formula: max(config.MINSTOCKMOVE,ATR⋅3) is correct?
2. ✅ Adaptive EXTREME_VOLATILITY formula: max(config.EXTREMEVOLATILITYTHRESHOLD,ATR⋅3)is correct?
3. ✅ Cooldown periods (30 min regular, 120 min UHC) are appropriate?
4. ✅ The 6 rejection reasons cover all major cases?
5. ✅ The order of checks (Extreme Vol → Min Move → UHC → SPY → Thresholds → Dollar Vol → Cooldown) is optimal?
Thank you for your thorough review! Your feedback has been invaluable in building a robust, production-ready system. 🙏
💡 Why These Questions?
مطلق الشمري
The material on this website is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell, a solicitation to buy, or a recommendation or endorsement for any security or strategy, nor does it constitute an offer to provide investment advisory services by QuantConnect. In addition, the material offers no opinion with respect to the suitability of any security or specific investment. QuantConnect makes no guarantees as to the accuracy or completeness of the views expressed in the website. The views are subject to change, and may have become unreliable for various reasons, including changes in market conditions or economic circumstances. All investments involve risk, including loss of principal. You should consult with an investment professional before making any investment decisions.
To unlock posting to the community forums please complete at least 30% of Boot Camp.
You can continue your Boot Camp training progress from the terminal. We hope to see you in the community soon!